cjacobs: (pic#18311480)
Carl Jacobs ([personal profile] cjacobs) wrote in [community profile] veilbreak2026-02-12 11:56 am
Entry tags:

CJACOBS: 002

Maryle and I were able to pull data from the CPU delivered by Cal and Eva.

The Sterilization Event was triggered by a significant group of people in Xitang being partially severed from the veil. 20 self-reports were evaluated by HDroids, which identified a specific defect in the neural implants. HDroids fixed the imperfections and relinked to the Veil. However, anti-Architect graffiti began to pop up around the city, indicating more people had defective implants other than the 20 self-reports.

Mass scans revealed that the entire city had spontaneously partially severed. This triggered three protocols:
  1. The sterlization protocol in Xitang. We disrupted this.
  2. Mandatory inspection check by HDroids for anyone with chips that were implanted in 2005 is currently ongoing.
  3. A relocation effort of all defective implants to Sighisoara, Romania by Feb 28. This is for another sterilization protocol.

Issues
  1. Do any Dislinked agents have a chip that was implanted in 2005? If so, they are going to end up being noticed as not on the radar.
  2. How to deal with Sighisoara, Romania?

Do we fully sever the evacuees, or relink them? Being in a prolonged partial state can trigger catastrophic neural regression. Relinking them and re-integrating them into other pres cities would keep them protected.

How do we deal with our agents who had chips in 2005?

[Engineering]
Do any of you have a 2005 implant?
witlessbay: (10)

ic.

[personal profile] witlessbay 2026-02-13 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
i think there are enough people here that are so opposed that they'll find an alternative
iyla: (pic#18306534)

ic.

[personal profile] iyla 2026-02-13 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
you’re probably right. it doesn’t happen that often, but…
iyla: (pic#18306566)

ic.

[personal profile] iyla 2026-02-13 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
yes. […] i’m joking, mostly.
witlessbay: (03)

ic.

[personal profile] witlessbay 2026-02-13 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
at least you still have your sense of humour
iyla: (pic#18309751)

ic.

[personal profile] iyla 2026-02-13 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
i wouldn’t say i’m not worried, but until there’s a plan that screws me, i’m not panicking.
witlessbay: (14)

ic.

[personal profile] witlessbay 2026-02-13 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
if you guys don't agree to it, i don't know why we would go ahead with it. then we're no better than them
iyla: (pic#18306508)

ic.

[personal profile] iyla 2026-02-13 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
i’m not worried they’ll try to force us. i’m worried the best plan will involve doing something that i don’t want to.
witlessbay: (02)

ic.

[personal profile] witlessbay 2026-02-13 01:50 am (UTC)(link)
[...] well. like you said. let's not borrow trouble
iyla: (pic#18306508)

ic.

[personal profile] iyla 2026-02-13 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
you’re right. well, i’m right. technically.
iyla: (pic#18309758)

ic.

[personal profile] iyla 2026-02-13 05:57 am (UTC)(link)
i appreciate your willingness to recognize that.
Edited 2026-02-13 05:57 (UTC)
iyla: (pic#18306522)

ic.

[personal profile] iyla 2026-02-13 03:44 pm (UTC)(link)
[…] what are you up to right now?
witlessbay: (Default)

ic.

[personal profile] witlessbay 2026-02-13 03:55 pm (UTC)(link)
organizing my snacks. what do you need?
iyla: (pic#18309912)

ic.

[personal profile] iyla 2026-02-13 04:09 pm (UTC)(link)
someone to hang out with. you available?
witlessbay: (11)

ic.

[personal profile] witlessbay 2026-02-13 05:15 pm (UTC)(link)
sure. you want me to come to you?
iyla: (pic#18306536)

ic.

[personal profile] iyla 2026-02-13 05:30 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, come over.
witlessbay: (01)

ic.

[personal profile] witlessbay 2026-02-13 05:36 pm (UTC)(link)
be there soon