Entry tags:
CJACOBS: 002
Maryle and I were able to pull data from the CPU delivered by Cal and Eva.
The Sterilization Event was triggered by a significant group of people in Xitang being partially severed from the veil. 20 self-reports were evaluated by HDroids, which identified a specific defect in the neural implants. HDroids fixed the imperfections and relinked to the Veil. However, anti-Architect graffiti began to pop up around the city, indicating more people had defective implants other than the 20 self-reports.
Mass scans revealed that the entire city had spontaneously partially severed. This triggered three protocols:
Issues
Do we fully sever the evacuees, or relink them? Being in a prolonged partial state can trigger catastrophic neural regression. Relinking them and re-integrating them into other pres cities would keep them protected.
How do we deal with our agents who had chips in 2005?
[Engineering]
The Sterilization Event was triggered by a significant group of people in Xitang being partially severed from the veil. 20 self-reports were evaluated by HDroids, which identified a specific defect in the neural implants. HDroids fixed the imperfections and relinked to the Veil. However, anti-Architect graffiti began to pop up around the city, indicating more people had defective implants other than the 20 self-reports.
Mass scans revealed that the entire city had spontaneously partially severed. This triggered three protocols:
- The sterlization protocol in Xitang. We disrupted this.
- Mandatory inspection check by HDroids for anyone with chips that were implanted in 2005 is currently ongoing.
- A relocation effort of all defective implants to Sighisoara, Romania by Feb 28. This is for another sterilization protocol.
Issues
- Do any Dislinked agents have a chip that was implanted in 2005? If so, they are going to end up being noticed as not on the radar.
- How to deal with Sighisoara, Romania?
Do we fully sever the evacuees, or relink them? Being in a prolonged partial state can trigger catastrophic neural regression. Relinking them and re-integrating them into other pres cities would keep them protected.
How do we deal with our agents who had chips in 2005?
[Engineering]
Do any of you have a 2005 implant?

maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
Unintentionally, within the past few months I suspect.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
Just someone temporarily on the ship, so I had to work fast.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
Someone from Espionage was up for [...] something, who knows. It didn't matter to me. Still doesn't. I knew they had a flask on them, and also they were attractive, and also sometimes there's an itch despite my usual issue with touch.
Tactically applied flattery but mostly honesty because, of course, Espionage. A little bit of push and pull because everyone likes that and I wanted to properly lock this in. Started work late day one, payoff by early day three. And I got to keep their flask. Hopefully they never return.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
Any particularly impressive work on your side?
And thank you for the distraction.
maryle/dom.
And yes, of course, distraction is what I do best. And yes, I believe there has been.
maryle/dom.
I'd like more details, please.
maryle/dom.
A [...] rather hands-off affair that I wouldn't be so callous as to call one-sided.
maryle/dom.
[....]
Is it hands-off because it's not entirely one-sided?
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
Things are different now, with you here.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
Do you want to talk about this hands-off situation?
maryle/dom.
Mi vida, you won't be able to take back what you learn if we do.
maryle/dom.
Mi corazón, who do you think I am? Literally nothing will scare me.
maryle/dom.
It's [...] not unlike the negotiations you and I used to engage in, with the exceptions of its aforementioned hands-off nature and the other party being a great deal more [......] acquiescent.
maryle/dom.
Wow, inappropriate things to share with your coworker. And I can't believe someone would be more compliant than me.
You're enjoying yourself, though? [...] Or is it causing too much discontent because of the feelings aspect of it all?
maryle/dom.
A combination of the two? I'm enjoying myself immensely and yet it's all in the name of something I can't have, hence the discontent.
maryle/dom.
[...]
And why can't you have this "something"?
maryle/dom.
We want different things. [...] Which is fine for now; there's no need for me to chase anything but I can't shake the feeling that I'm playing with fire.
maryle/dom.
I understand that. [...] I'm sure you're being clear about expectations and wants, which doesn't guarantee anything, but [...] I don't know, Dom. Honestly, everything up here is playing with fire.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.
maryle/dom.