adrii: (002)
AdrΓ­an Aldana ([personal profile] adrii) wrote in [community profile] veilbreak2026-02-03 08:53 am
Entry tags:

aaldana 001.

This has already been approved by Verin and leadership. This is not a debate on if we should. It is a debate on how.

We will be going forward with additional experimentation to further stabilise the Neuroclast. To do this, we will be taking volunteers among those who have had an implant that is not TIF. The process will include baseline and progressive scans, temporary monitored linking to the Veil and exponentially increasing exposure to experimental Neuroclast packets while simultaneously stimulating the dorsolateral and ventrolateral PAG when disconnecting from it. The goal is to get below a 4% risk of side effects when disrupting or destroying a node.

This procedure is not without risk, and the risks include: chronic pain (headaches/migraines, shooting or radiating pain stemming from the neck down), paralysis/spastic limbs, death.

Volunteers would need to understand and accept the risks as well as undergo a thorough psychological examination. We would need 3-5 volunteers, and where to source those volunteers is the current issue at hand. My personal preference would be to take volunteers from onboard Mnemosyne. Others have suggested we take volunteers from the unVeiled cities. There is also an option for a mixture from both.

Neither sourcing is without risk. We already operate at a resource deficit, and taking agents further increases that deficit. If that volunteer is in a leadership role, we risk years of knowledge and experience. If we take from the cities, it's a security risk to bring them onboard. Propaganda will spread further of us being like the Architects in that we are choosing not to experiment from within.

We're leaving it up you all to decide how we source volunteers. Again, this will be happening, so spare me the ethics debate of experimenting on humans. If there was another way, chances are we've already tried it.

NIKO.
What's going on with you and Domingo? The flirting is obnoxious. Just fuck already.
foundlostfound: (🚁23)

Sloane/Bobby

[personal profile] foundlostfound 2026-02-03 08:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I’d face more. If I had to.
finotti: (NT (13))

Sloane/Bobby

[personal profile] finotti 2026-02-03 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I know I'll never get it because I was never veiled. But it seems risky to volunteer for something they've decided they're too important for but we're more expendable
foundlostfound: (🚁08)

Sloane/Bobby

[personal profile] foundlostfound 2026-02-03 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I mean. I’m sure not coming up with the solutions to Veiling in my spare time. It makes sense to me that they wouldn’t want to risk their minds.

And I’m a soldier for them anyway. What’s one more risk.
finotti: (NT (81))

Sloane/Bobby

[personal profile] finotti 2026-02-03 08:58 pm (UTC)(link)
You're a person
foundlostfound: (🚁27)

Sloane/Bobby

[personal profile] foundlostfound 2026-02-03 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Everyone’s a person. And I have less to lose than most.
finotti: (NT (61))

Sloane/Bobby

[personal profile] finotti 2026-02-03 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
That doesn't mean you should risk it
foundlostfound: (🚁81)

Sloane/Bobby

[personal profile] foundlostfound 2026-02-03 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)
It’s not the main reason I am. It just helps.

But no one has to worry about me.
finotti: (Default)

Re: Sloane/Bobby

[personal profile] finotti 2026-02-03 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)

That's too bad, I'll already worry

foundlostfound: (🚁65)

Sloane/Bobby

[personal profile] foundlostfound 2026-02-04 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
But you don't know me really.
finotti: (NT (7))

Sloane/Bobby

[personal profile] finotti 2026-02-04 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
I know Apollo
foundlostfound: (🚁36)

Sloane/Bobby

[personal profile] foundlostfound 2026-02-04 01:55 am (UTC)(link)
I know.
[...] I can promise that decision was his own.
foundlostfound: (🚁71)

Sloane/Bobby

[personal profile] foundlostfound 2026-02-04 02:20 am (UTC)(link)
So I won't even think about asking you to not worry about him.
finotti: (NT (79))

Sloane/Bobby

[personal profile] finotti 2026-02-04 02:26 am (UTC)(link)
I can worry about more than one person at a time
foundlostfound: (🚁73)

Sloane/Bobby

[personal profile] foundlostfound 2026-02-04 02:40 am (UTC)(link)
Hate it when people are great at multitasking.
I'll assess the risk ongoing.
finotti: (NT (81))

Sloane/Bobby

[personal profile] finotti 2026-02-04 02:41 am (UTC)(link)
The risk of signing up?
foundlostfound: (🚁09)

Sloane/Bobby

[personal profile] foundlostfound 2026-02-04 02:42 am (UTC)(link)
Or continuing. Yeah.
finotti: (Default)

Re: Sloane/Bobby

[personal profile] finotti 2026-02-04 02:48 am (UTC)(link)

It can quickly become too late to reassess